I have a question regarding Sir Amik Varze. I'm aware of the White Knights (By Guthix it's a bad name but they are a political-military organization) but in feudal Society (yes I do understand that RuneScape doesn’t care about how countries are managed, or how large areas are... areas are just too small) a knight could be at the bottom, and a king at the top. Only an emperor can beat a King.
Amik would have a peerage if he is the ruler of the king's horse. That would also make Burthorpe into a principality. (I think the principality is huge and that it is just the capital).
As for the Kinshra: they were expelled from Falador and also on mountains (I'm thinking that the mountains separate Asgarnia and Misthalin from Wilderness... It seems odd to have one mountain by itself), so I'm guessing that Daquarius is the chief and marquess of the Kinshra.
This is logical since he holds the title of lord. Also what is the reason Sir Amik merely a knight compared to Daquarius and a Lord? What do you think? Would a knight really be allowed to lead a kingdom? Sorry for some unrelated parts. I simply copied and pasted it straight from a RSOF posting.
The grave situation makes absolutely no sense to me. for those who don't know, it's the arguement that gravestones won't be blessed as thieves will take your treasure. In ignoring the fact that prior to 07, it was precisely that but you didn't have the grace period of 6 minutes to pick up your possessions, I fail to see what's wrong with this.
If you want to know more information about OSRS Gold , please lock on RSorder.com